PulStar Blog

PulStar VS EWST

PulStar vs. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT): Why Buy into ESWT When PulStar Does the Same & More?

In today’s chiropractic and rehab landscape, technology is everywhere. From decompression tables to cold lasers to ESWT, clinicians have no shortage of devices vying for their attention. But here’s a question I hear from doctors all the time:

“If I already have a PulStar, why should I invest in an ESWT device?”

It’s a fair question – so let’s take a closer look.

What PulStar Brings to the Table

PulStar isn’t just another adjusting tool. It’s a computer-assisted analysis and adjusting system that measures spinal stiffness, documents compliance changes, and delivers precise multiple impulse therapy (MIT). That means it does two jobs at once:

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: Useful, But Limited

Shockwave (extracorporeal shockwave therapy, or ESWT) has gained traction as a non-invasive treatment for stubborn tendon issues like plantar fasciitis and calcific shoulder tendinitis. It can be effective – but here’s the catch:

Modes and Frequencies: Where PulStar Leaves ESWT Behind

This is where PulStar really shines. ESWT is essentially a one-speed hammer: it delivers repetitive acoustic pulses with limited adjustability.

PulStar, by contrast, gives you a range of modes and frequencies that let you tailor treatment precisely to the patient:

This means you can dial treatment in for children, seniors, athletes, or fragile patients – all with the same device. Shockwave simply doesn’t give you that level of flexibility.

PulStar Already Covers ESWT’s Ground

PulStar already demonstrates strong results in areas ESWT is supposed to specialize in. For example:

So… Why Buy into ESWT When You Already Have a PulStar?

If you’re already using PulStar, you’ve got:

Shockwave might make sense as a niche add-on for very specific chronic tendon conditions. But for most practices, PulStar already delivers the versatility, documentation, and clinical power that ESWT can’t match.

PulStar vs. ESWT: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature / Benefit PulStar Multiple Impulse Therapy ✅ ESWT ⚡
Core Function Computer-assisted analysis + treatment (measures stiffness, documents, adjusts) Single-purpose acoustic pulses (no analysis or documentation)
Treatment Modes Point Mode (targeted) + Myofascial Mode (broad release) Single pulse delivery only
Frequency Control Multiple programmable frequencies for gentle or deep treatment Limited adjustability (mainly intensity)
Comfort Gentle, well-tolerated - even infants and seniors Often painful/uncomfortable during treatment
Applications Broad: spinal stiffness, acute & chronic pain, calcific tendonitis, myofascial release, musculoskeletal dysfunction Narrow: chronic tendinopathies (plantar fasciitis, calcific tendinitis, etc.)
Documentation Visual, objective compliance data before, after & during treatment None
Patient Communication Graphs and visual feedback build trust & engagement Verbal-only (no measurable output)
FDA Clearance Yes, cleared since 1994 Yes, but limited scope
Versatility Spine, joints, soft tissue, extremities, safe pediatric use Mostly tendon/soft tissue only
Investment Value One device = analysis + therapy + patient education One device = therapy only

👉 PulStar gives you precision, versatility, comfort, and documentation—all in one system.

Ready to see how PulStar can change your practice? Schedule a demo and experience the difference for yourself.

PulStar and shockwave therapy: common questions

Separate the treatment mechanisms before comparing equipment and clinical evidence.

No. PulStar Multiple Impulse Therapy uses an adjusting instrument to deliver controlled mechanical impulses and collect analysis data. Focused shockwave therapy uses acoustic shockwaves applied through the skin. These are different technologies, so their treatment settings, clinical evidence and intended uses should not be treated as interchangeable.

No. Focused shockwaves and radial pressure waves have different physical properties and energy patterns. Focused shockwaves concentrate energy at a depth, while radial pressure waves have their highest energy near the applicator. Mayo Clinic explains the distinction, which matters when identifying the equipment and evidence being discussed.

Owning a PulStar does not by itself establish whether ESWT is appropriate for a practice. PulStar and shockwave technologies have different mechanisms. Decisions should start with the conditions a clinician intends to manage and the evidence for the specific device and protocol, rather than assume that one system replaces the other.

PulStar combines instrument-based analysis with multiple impulse adjusting and visual documentation. The practitioner can review measured stiffness and changes between readings within the software. Those analysis and record-review functions are useful features to examine during a demonstration, separately from any claims about treatment results for a particular condition.

Compare the exact devices, their intended uses, supporting research, training requirements and complete quoted costs. For PulStar, ask to see analysis, adjusting and review of prior readings in a free live demo. For shockwave equipment, identify whether the device produces focused shockwaves or radial pressure waves before comparing specifications.

Picture of Christian Evans

Christian Evans

Related Posts